Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Natural Disasters are on the Rise

 

This past decade, natural disasters have become more frequent and devastating, and they are setting new records.  In 2002, natural disasters caused $85 billion in economic losses worldwide, an increase of 36 per cent from 2001.  During the summer of 2002, Western Canada suffered its worst drought ever recorded.  In 2003, earthquakes, volcanoes, floods, droughts, storms, fires and landslides killed about 83,000 people, 30,000 more than the number of deaths 13 years earlier.  There were 337 natural disasters in 2003, 76 more than in 1990, according to the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. In 2003, I stood on the picturesque shoreline of Phi-Phi Island off the coast of Thailand. In 2004, the Indian Ocean Tsunami completed decimated the region with the longest reported undersea faulting ever observed.

Global warming, or the average increase in temperature in the atmosphere near the earth’s surface, involves severe disruption of the complex global climate system. We now know that this is because human activity has led to dramatically increased concentrations of CO2 in our atmosphere.  According to Scientific American, seven billion tons of carbon are released into the atmosphere each year.  By 2056, unless we make some dramatic changes, population growth and corresponding consumption of energy will double the emission of carbon into the atmosphere, placing it at 14 billion tons each year.  There is almost unanimous agreement in the scientific community of the direct relationship between the growth of greenhouse gas emissions and the dramatic rise in average temperature that has occurred over the past several decades.  Al Gore recently presented data that “2005 was the hottest year ever measured, and the 12 months ending this past summer, June of 2006, was the hottest 12-month period ever measured in the United States of America.”

The exponential increase in the average temperature of the earth’s surface is having devastating effects.  The retreat of glaciers, thinning of Arctic ice, and in turn, rise in sea levels, is increasing the threat of damaging floods to humans and wildlife.  Skiers and others are at increasing risk of avalanches, as rising temperatures release giant blocks of snow and ice in mountainous regions.  Rising temperatures are increasing the rate of droughts and causing famines, the most recent being the 2005 famine in southern Niger.  Wildfires are increasing in hot and dry regions across North America, Australia, and southern Europe.

Global warming will very likely lead to a rise in the number of hurricanes, which are formed in warm waters.  Although land heats up more quickly, water requires longer periods to cool down.  The combination of warm water and water vapor can create a grouping of thunderclouds that are set spinning by the rotation of the earth and polar winds.  2005 saw record average sea temperatures in the tropical Atlantic. The 140 mph winds of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 grew in strength over warmer waters, creating a storm surge that was the most destructive and expensive natural disaster in U.S. history.

Of course, understanding the workings of the climate system is only the prelude to finding solutions to global warming and addressing the rise in natural disasters. Some problems must be addressed quickly, such as the lack of efficient communications and disaster warning systems in undeveloped and other areas of the world.  When the Indian Ocean Tsunami struck in 2004, no warning system in the Indian Ocean was in place. Thousands of deaths could have been prevented if people had had even a few minutes of advance warning.  Much work still needs to be done to develop better emergency response systems, community disaster relief programs, government risk reduction programs, and a global tsunami warning system.

We cannot prevent the occurrence of natural disasters that are due to changes that have already been set in motion. But we can begin to alter the adverse imprint that the human population has on nature. In the meantime, we will be coping with more and more severe floods, droughts, and storms.  Even as the number of humans on the planet continues to increase, we can modify coastal development projects, reduce energy consumption and pollution, and make our coastal areas less vulnerable.  After all, we humans have only one life-sustaining planet.

 

Karen Shilo, a recent graduate of Brandeis University, is a Newton resident. 

Read More...

Improving Our Parklands-- a Democratic Tradition

 

In 2006, Massachusetts was ranked 48th out of 50 states in per capita spending on parks and recreation.  After adjusting for inflation there has been a 33% decline in the urban parks budget since 2001, and the Department of Conservation and Recreation has been forced to cut 20% of its staff in the last five years.  Funding and performance go hand-in-hand, and due to fiscal constraints, state parks have suffered serious problems concerning the upkeep of what is becoming a decrepit infrastructure.

Our state parks serve as the wellsprings of a healthy, active community and are a physical embodiment of democratic ideals. Newton residents’ lives are enriched by the recreational and aesthetic benefits offered by Hemlock Gorge, Hammond Pond, the Upper Charles, and the Chestnut Hill Reservoir.  Parks offer many environmental benefits, including encouraging biodiversity and mitigating the effects of pollution and climate change.  Parks also help protect water quality, particularly by reducing stormwater runoff and limiting the quantity of harmful fertilizers that run into streams from suburban lawns. Massachusetts has long been at the vanguard of land protection and conservation, and state government has a duty to protect and improve green spaces throughout the Commonwealth. 

In 2003 Governor Romney decided to merge two existing agencies to create the DCR, thereby consolidating Massachusetts’ state park administration under one umbrella.  Unfortunately, since then, there has been a steady trend of reduced funding.  Advocacy groups have attempted to bridge fiscal gaps and have played an important role in publicizing the need for increased park funding and environmental stewardship, but these efforts, while commendable, cannot stand alone: without an active citizenry and government support, the efforts of advocacy groups can only serve as stop-gaps.  As in any democratic process, active citizen participation is crucial. One important resource available to citizens who want to protect and improve our state parks is the DCR Stewardship Council.

The Stewardship Council is a 13-member citizen advisory council appointed by the Governor to oversee the DCR and work with the agency to provide well-maintained and well-managed parks.  It is composed of environmental advocates, business leaders, and academics working to provide accountability in agency oversight and to set up long term goals in the fields of resource management planning, capital planning, and policy development.  They work as impartial advisors. Recognizing that the current DCR budget is “bare-boned” the Council has acknowledged the need for better planning and more fiscal discipline.  It examines budget allocations, and has applauded some decisions, such as the allotment of 1.5 million dollars for stormwater management remediation, while criticizing other decisions, such as the idea of giving the Urban Parks and Recreation the responsibility of maintaining 166 new acres (the Central Artery/Tunnel Parks and Spectacle Island) with no increase in budgeting. The latter decision was revised by the DCR due in part to the council’s criticisms. 

The DCR Stewardship Council is truly democratic.  All of the meetings are attended by DCR Commissioner Priscilla Geigis and are open to the public, giving an invaluable forum for citizens and advocacy groups to voice their opinions directly to the government administrators on policy issues that shape our parks.  Public comments are welcomed and recorded.

In addition to participating in the Stewardship Council, there are many opportunities for citizens to become active stewards for our parks, by volunteering with local advocacy groups, including the Charles River Conservancy, which has a large Volunteer corps. CRC volunteers have been improving the riverbanks through shoreline restoration, invasive species removal, and overall park maintenance. Charles River Watershed Association volunteers are working to improve water quality in the watershed. The Friends of the Hemlock Gorge and the Conservation and Recreation Campaign are other groups that welcome volunteers.  All of us should let our local officials know that we feel that parks are important and should be adequately funded.   It is up to us as citizens to take part - to “check back in”, as Governor Deval Patrick says - in the great democratic process of taking responsibility for our parks and finding viable solutions to their problems.

John Broderick is the Stewardship Program Assistant for the Charles River Conservancy. He can be reached at  jrb@thecharles.org.

Read More...

The importance of removing invasive plants

By Florrie Funk

 

An invasive plant is a non-native species capable of spreading aggressively and monopolizing essential habitat resources–

light, nutrients, water, and space, to the detriment of other species.

Our planet's life forms co-evolved over millions of years as complex, interdependent communities of organisms called ecosystems. Each species within an ecosystem depends on other species to provide nutrients, circumstances necessary for reproduction, and limits to its expansion.

Many plants rely on fungi and other soil organisms to decompose dead plants and animals, thereby releasing nitrogen and other nutrients into the soil. Specific plants often depend on specific insect species to pollinate their flowers so that they produce seeds, and they depend on other animals to help disperse those seeds. The community of organisms that make up an ecosystem includes of a variety of herbivores, predators, fungi, bacteria and other pathogens that help an ecosystem stay in balance by preventing one species from increasing to the point of extirpating others. When biodiversity (the number of different species) is reduced, this compromises the ability of an ecosystem to withstand drought, blights and other environmental stresses.

In our suburban communities, native species are being weakened by loss of biodiversity caused by habitat fragmentation. Ever-smaller natural areas are being separated by ever-wider highways and developments. Small, isolated populations of plants and animals, unable to exchange genes with other populations, become inbred and eventually die out.

The introduction of alien organisms has seriously compounded this problem. Some alien species were introduced intentionally by horticulturalists and others arrived by accident in soil or imported products. Some of these species do not survive; others persist as benign members of the community. But others grow and reproduce rapidly, displacing whole communities of native plants, sometimes causing rapid reductions in biodiversity and the extinction of other species.

Worldwide, invasive alien species are the second leading cause of species extinction. (The leading cause is habitat destruction.) More than 28% of the world’

s native species are threatened or endangered. There are 4000 non-native species grown outside of cultivation in the US (including 200 species in MA). The economic cost is estimated at $137 billion dollars annually (mostly from lost crops) and has led to a decline of 42% of endangered and threatened species nationwide.

In Newton, the worst offending invasive plants are species planted as ornamentals, such as Norway Maples, Japanese Barberry, Burning Bush, Oriental Bittersweet Vine, Japanese Knotweed (sometimes called “bamboo”

), Common and Glossy Buckthorn, Asian Shrub Honeysuckles, and Tree-of-Heaven.  Many of the characteristics that make a plant a good garden choice - rapid growth, disease resistance, easy propagation - increase the chances of its becoming invasive. These plants all produce seeds that are carried by birds or wind into natural areas, roadsides and vacant lots where they germinate, grow quickly and reproduce. This vegetation often looks at first glance like nature happily doing what it is supposed to do.  But dense patches of Japanese Knotweed or monoculture groves of Norway Maples are actually heartbreaking reminders of the many dozens of species that are now gone:  wildflowers, ferns, grasses, shrubs, trees, plus the insects, birds and other animals that depend on them.

In the past, conservation areas were purchased and left alone, and nature took care of itself.  No longer.  Due to the proliferation of invasive species most forests and conservation areas must now be actively managed.  If invasive species are not controlled, overall species diversity will decline, and the loss will be irreversible.

The MA Department of Agricultural Resources "Massachusetts Prohibited Plant List" designates 141 plants, including many popular ornamentals that are now prohibited from being imported, sold or propagated.  This ban may help reduce the spread of invasive species, but in many cases the horse is already out of the barn.

Promising research is being done on biological controls, such as a beetle species that eats Purple Loosestrife (a highly invasive plant found in wetlands throughout North America), but these methods are still experimental and may entail ecological risks. To learn what you can do to help to limit the spread of invasive species, visit: newfs.org (New England Wildflower Society), tncweeds.ucdavis.edu (Nature Conservancy), nps.gov/plants/alien (National Parks Service) and www.newtonconservators.org (Newton Conservators).

Florrie Funk, florriemfunk@aol.com, has taught interpretive nature study programs in CA, FL, MO and IL and assisted with ecological research and habitat restoration at the Chicago Botanic Garden and in Highland Park. 

Read More...